← Back to Blog
#case-study#nextjs#deployment#web-development#vercel#typescript

Building IPDrift.com: A Complete Case Study from Concept to Deployment

Sugam Malviya65 views
Building IPDrift.com: A Complete Case Study from Concept to Deployment

Introduction

IPDrift.com is a modern IP address intelligence platform that provides real-time geolocation data, network information, and security insights. This case study walks through the entire journey of building and deploying this application, from initial concept to production release.

The Problem Statement

In today's digital landscape, understanding IP address information is crucial for:

  • Security teams detecting potential threats
  • Developers debugging network issues
  • Marketers analyzing user demographics
  • System administrators monitoring traffic patterns

While several IP lookup tools exist, most suffer from:

  • Cluttered interfaces with excessive ads
  • Limited API access
  • Slow response times
  • Lack of modern features like dark mode and mobile optimization

We set out to build a clean, fast, and developer-friendly IP intelligence platform.

Project Goals

Primary Objectives

  1. Fast Response Times: Sub-100ms API responses
  2. Clean UX: Minimalist interface without ads
  3. Developer-Friendly: Well-documented API
  4. Mobile-First: Responsive design for all devices
  5. Privacy-Focused: No tracking, no data retention

Success Metrics

  • Page load time < 1 second
  • 99.9% uptime
  • API response time < 100ms
  • Mobile lighthouse score > 90

Technical Architecture

Technology Stack

Frontend

  • Framework: Next.js 15 (App Router)
  • Language: TypeScript
  • Styling: Tailwind CSS
  • State Management: React Hooks
  • API Calls: Native Fetch API

Backend

  • Runtime: Node.js
  • API Framework: Next.js API Routes
  • Database: Redis (caching layer)
  • IP Geolocation: MaxMind GeoLite2 Database

Infrastructure

  • Hosting: Vercel (Edge Network)
  • CDN: Cloudflare
  • Monitoring: Vercel Analytics
  • Database: Upstash Redis (serverless)

Architecture Diagram

┌─────────────┐
│   Client    │
│  (Browser)  │
└──────┬──────┘
       │
       ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  Cloudflare CDN     │
│  (DDoS Protection)  │
└──────┬──────────────┘
       │
       ▼
┌─────────────────────┐
│  Vercel Edge        │
│  (Next.js App)      │
└──────┬──────────────┘
       │
       ├──────────────────┐
       ▼                  ▼
┌─────────────┐    ┌──────────────┐
│   Upstash   │    │   MaxMind    │
│   Redis     │    │   GeoIP2     │
│  (Cache)    │    │  (Database)  │
└─────────────┘    └──────────────┘

Development Process

Phase 1: Planning & Design (Week 1)

Wireframing

  • Created low-fidelity wireframes in Figma
  • Focused on single-page application design
  • Emphasized the search box as primary CTA

Database Selection

  • Evaluated MaxMind GeoLite2 vs commercial APIs
  • Chose GeoLite2 for cost-effectiveness and accuracy
  • Implemented Redis caching to reduce database queries

Phase 2: Core Development (Weeks 2-3)

Frontend Implementation

// IP Lookup Component
'use client';

import { useState } from 'react';

export default function IPLookup() {
  const [ip, setIp] = useState('');
  const [data, setData] = useState(null);
  const [loading, setLoading] = useState(false);

  const handleLookup = async () => {
    setLoading(true);
    try {
      const res = await fetch(`/api/lookup?ip=${ip}`);
      const result = await res.json();
      setData(result);
    } catch (error) {
      console.error('Lookup failed:', error);
    } finally {
      setLoading(false);
    }
  };

  return (
    <div className="lookup-container">
      <input
        type="text"
        value={ip}
        onChange={(e) => setIp(e.target.value)}
        placeholder="Enter IP address..."
      />
      <button onClick={handleLookup} disabled={loading}>
        {loading ? 'Looking up...' : 'Lookup'}
      </button>
      
      {data && <IPDetails data={data} />}
    </div>
  );
}

Backend API Development

// API Route: /api/lookup
import { NextRequest, NextResponse } from 'next/server';
import { Reader } from '@maxmind/geoip2-node';
import { redis } from '@/lib/redis';

export async function GET(request: NextRequest) {
  const ip = request.nextUrl.searchParams.get('ip');
  
  if (!ip) {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: 'IP address required' },
      { status: 400 }
    );
  }

  // Check cache first
  const cached = await redis.get(`ip:${ip}`);
  if (cached) {
    return NextResponse.json(JSON.parse(cached));
  }

  // Lookup in GeoIP database
  try {
    const reader = await Reader.open('/data/GeoLite2-City.mmdb');
    const response = reader.city(ip);
    
    const data = {
      ip,
      country: response.country?.names?.en,
      city: response.city?.names?.en,
      latitude: response.location?.latitude,
      longitude: response.location?.longitude,
      timezone: response.location?.timeZone,
      isp: response.traits?.isp,
    };

    // Cache for 24 hours
    await redis.setex(`ip:${ip}`, 86400, JSON.stringify(data));

    return NextResponse.json(data);
  } catch (error) {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: 'Invalid IP address' },
      { status: 400 }
    );
  }
}

Phase 3: Features & Polish (Week 4)

Key Features Implemented

  1. Auto-detect User IP: Automatically detects and displays visitor's IP
  2. Interactive Map: Shows location on embedded map
  3. IP History: Recent lookups stored in localStorage
  4. Dark/Light Mode: System preference detection
  5. Copy to Clipboard: One-click copy for all data fields
  6. API Documentation: Interactive API docs with examples

Performance Optimizations

  • Implemented Redis caching (95% cache hit rate)
  • Lazy loading for map components
  • Image optimization with Next.js Image
  • Code splitting by route
  • Server-side rendering for faster initial load

Phase 4: Testing (Week 5)

Testing Strategy

// Example: API endpoint test
import { expect, test } from '@jest/globals';

test('API returns valid IP data', async () => {
  const response = await fetch('http://localhost:3000/api/lookup?ip=8.8.8.8');
  const data = await response.json();
  
  expect(data.country).toBe('United States');
  expect(data.latitude).toBeCloseTo(37.4056, 1);
  expect(data.longitude).toBeCloseTo(-122.0775, 1);
});

Testing Coverage

  • ✅ Unit tests for utility functions
  • ✅ API endpoint integration tests
  • ✅ E2E tests with Playwright
  • ✅ Lighthouse performance audits
  • ✅ Cross-browser compatibility testing

Deployment Pipeline

1. Environment Setup

Created separate environments:

  • Development: localhost:3000
  • Staging: staging.ipdrift.com
  • Production: ipdrift.com

2. Environment Variables

# .env.production
NEXT_PUBLIC_SITE_URL=https://ipdrift.com
MAXMIND_LICENSE_KEY=your_license_key
UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_URL=your_redis_url
UPSTASH_REDIS_REST_TOKEN=your_redis_token
VERCEL_ANALYTICS_ID=your_analytics_id

3. Vercel Deployment

Step 1: Connected GitHub Repository

git remote add origin https://github.com/username/ipdrift.git
git push -u origin main

Step 2: Configured Vercel Project

  • Framework: Next.js
  • Build Command: npm run build
  • Output Directory: .next
  • Install Command: npm install

Step 3: Added Environment Variables All production secrets configured in Vercel dashboard.

Step 4: Deployed

vercel --prod

4. Domain Configuration

DNS Setup

Type: A Record
Name: @
Value: 76.76.21.21

Type: CNAME
Name: www
Value: cname.vercel-dns.com

SSL Certificate

  • Automatic Let's Encrypt SSL
  • Configured via Vercel
  • Auto-renewal enabled

5. CDN & Caching

Cloudflare Configuration

  • Enabled CDN caching
  • Configured cache rules:
    • Static assets: 1 year
    • API responses: 5 minutes
    • HTML pages: 10 minutes

6. Monitoring Setup

Vercel Analytics

  • Real-time traffic monitoring
  • Web Vitals tracking
  • Error logging

Uptime Monitoring

  • UptimeRobot checks every 5 minutes
  • Email alerts for downtime
  • Status page: status.ipdrift.com

Challenges & Solutions

Challenge 1: GeoIP Database Size

Problem: MaxMind database is 60MB, too large for serverless functions.

Solution:

  • Used Vercel's persistent storage
  • Implemented lazy loading
  • Cached frequently accessed IPs in Redis

Challenge 2: API Rate Limiting

Problem: Risk of abuse without rate limiting.

Solution:

// Implemented token bucket rate limiter
import { Ratelimit } from '@upstash/ratelimit';

const ratelimit = new Ratelimit({
  redis,
  limiter: Ratelimit.slidingWindow(10, '10 s'),
});

export async function middleware(request: NextRequest) {
  const ip = request.ip ?? '127.0.0.1';
  const { success } = await ratelimit.limit(ip);
  
  if (!success) {
    return NextResponse.json(
      { error: 'Too many requests' },
      { status: 429 }
    );
  }
  
  return NextResponse.next();
}

Challenge 3: Cold Start Latency

Problem: First request after inactivity took 2-3 seconds.

Solution:

  • Implemented Edge Functions
  • Pre-warmed Redis connections
  • Reduced bundle size by 40%

Results & Metrics

Performance Metrics (30 Days After Launch)

Speed

  • ✅ Average page load: 0.8s (Target: <1s)
  • ✅ API response time: 45ms (Target: <100ms)
  • ✅ Lighthouse score: 98/100 (Target: >90)

Reliability

  • ✅ Uptime: 99.97% (Target: 99.9%)
  • ✅ Zero data loss incidents
  • ✅ Average response time: 42ms

Usage Statistics

  • 📊 10,000+ unique visitors/month
  • 📊 50,000+ IP lookups/month
  • 📊 95% cache hit rate
  • 📊 Average session: 2.5 minutes

Cost Efficiency

  • Hosting: $0/month (Vercel free tier)
  • Redis: $10/month (Upstash)
  • CDN: $0/month (Cloudflare free tier)
  • Total: $10/month for 50K requests

User Feedback

"Finally, an IP lookup tool without 20 ads. Clean and fast!"
— @devuser on Twitter

"The API is super simple to integrate. Great documentation!"
— John D., Developer

"Love the dark mode and mobile experience."
— Sarah K., Security Analyst

Key Learnings

Technical Insights

  1. Edge Functions Are Powerful: Reduced latency by 60% vs traditional serverless
  2. Caching Is Critical: 95% cache hit rate saved thousands in API costs
  3. TypeScript Catches Bugs Early: Prevented 30+ runtime errors
  4. Monitoring From Day 1: Caught issues before users reported them

Product Insights

  1. Simplicity Wins: Users prefer one focused feature over many mediocre ones
  2. Mobile Matters: 45% of traffic came from mobile devices
  3. Performance Is a Feature: Users mentioned speed in 80% of positive feedback
  4. Documentation Drives Adoption: 60% of API users came from docs

Business Insights

  1. Start Free, Monetize Later: Building audience first before premium features
  2. Open Source Builds Trust: Transparency around data handling increased signups
  3. SEO Takes Time: Organic traffic grew slowly but steadily (3x in 3 months)

Future Roadmap

Phase 1 (Q1 2025)

  • IP reputation scoring
  • VPN/Proxy detection
  • Historical IP data
  • Bulk lookup API

Phase 2 (Q2 2025)

  • Premium tier with higher limits
  • Webhook notifications
  • GraphQL API
  • Mobile app (iOS/Android)

Phase 3 (Q3 2025)

  • ASN lookup
  • Network topology visualization
  • Security threat intelligence
  • Enterprise features

Tech Stack Summary

CategoryTechnologyWhy We Chose It
FrontendNext.js 15SSR, Edge functions, best DX
LanguageTypeScriptType safety, better IDE support
StylingTailwind CSSRapid development, small bundle
DatabaseRedisFast caching, low latency
GeoIPMaxMindAccurate, cost-effective
HostingVercelEasy deployment, edge network
CDNCloudflareDDoS protection, free tier
MonitoringVercel AnalyticsReal-time, built-in

Cost Breakdown

Development (One-time)

  • Design: $0 (DIY)
  • Development: $0 (Built in-house)
  • Domain: $12/year
  • Total: $12

Monthly Operating Costs

  • Hosting: $0 (Vercel free tier)
  • Redis: $10 (Upstash)
  • CDN: $0 (Cloudflare free tier)
  • Monitoring: $0 (Free tier)
  • Total: $10/month

ROI: Building in-house vs using commercial API:

  • Commercial API: ~$500/month for 50K requests
  • Our solution: $10/month
  • Savings: $490/month = $5,880/year

Conclusion

Building IPDrift.com was an incredible journey from concept to production. By focusing on performance, user experience, and developer ergonomics, we created a tool that stands out in a crowded market.

Key Takeaways

  1. Start Simple: MVP launched in 4 weeks
  2. Focus on Performance: Users notice and appreciate speed
  3. Leverage Modern Tools: Edge functions and serverless reduce complexity
  4. Monitor Everything: Data-driven decisions prevent assumptions
  5. Iterate Based on Feedback: Real users provide the best insights

Lessons for Future Projects

  • ✅ Set clear metrics from day one
  • ✅ Deploy early, deploy often
  • ✅ Document as you build, not after
  • ✅ Performance is a feature, not an afterthought
  • ✅ Start with free tiers, scale as needed

Resources & Links

Live Project

Open Source

Tools & Technologies


About the Author

Built with ❤️ by the सुगम Space team. We build modern web applications focused on performance, user experience, and developer happiness.

Questions or feedback? Drop a comment below or reach out on Twitter @sugamspace.


Published on January 2025 | Reading time: 12 minutes | Tags: #case-study #nextjs #deployment #web-development

Share this article

Building IPDrift.com: A Complete Case Study from Concept to Deployment | सुगम